Which programming language is considered easier than machine language but still requires precise instructions?

Assembly Language is often regarded as easier to work with than machine language due to its use of symbolic names and a more manageable syntax. Machine language consists of binary code that is directly understood by the computer's hardware, making it very difficult for humans to read and write. In contrast, Assembly Language employs mnemonic codes and allows programmers to use more understandable labels instead of raw binary, which simplifies the coding process and makes it more accessible.

However, it is essential to note that Assembly Language still requires precise instructions, as it is closely tied to the underlying hardware architecture of the system. Programmers need to specify exact operations and memory addresses, which necessitates a deep understanding of the machine's architecture. This precision is what distinguishes it from higher-level programming languages, which often abstract away hardware details and allow for more flexible expression of logic and functionality.

High-level programming languages like Java, C++, and Pascal provide greater abstraction and typically do not require the same level of precision regarding hardware interactions, making them more user-friendly. Therefore, Assembly Language fits the description of being easier than machine language while still demanding an exact and meticulous approach to instruction writing.